New article at Ranorex, “Why You Need at Least Three Sets of Eyes on Your Code”

by Jeff Langr

July 09, 2018

three sets of eyes

Why You Need at Least Three Sets of Eyes on Your Code (9-Jul-2018)

Passive review after code (PRAC) is largely a waste of time.

In this blog post for Ranorex, I provide some reasons why active review is better than PRAC. I discuss pairing and mobbings as two forms of active rule, and present a core rule for review that focuses on outcome instead of mechanism.

Share your comment

Jeff Langr

About the Author

Jeff Langr has been building software for 40 years and writing about it heavily for 20. You can find out more about Jeff, learn from the many helpful articles and books he's written, or read one of his 1000+ combined blog (including Agile in a Flash) and public posts.